The technology

One water loop. Two coils. Both loads drop.

HEDS performs the same sub-cool step as any typical dehumidification system — but sources the reheat from the chilled-water return of its own cooling coil, through a second energy recovery coil. Every BTU the recovery coil pulls out of the return water is a BTU that doesn't have to be purchased as reheat and doesn't go back to the chiller — dropping both heating and cooling loads.

The core idea

One move cuts two loads at once.

HEDS meets real-world dehumidification and reheat loads — small, medium and large. The live operation screen shot from the Timken Museum example below shows the effects of HEDS. The other screens beneath it are also real projects.

Timken Museum live HEDS operation screen, 27-Aug-26: AHU controlling values, energy recovery savings panel, chilled-water and dewpoint state points across the unit
The Timken Museum live operation screen · 27-Aug-26 · the HEDS energy recovery savings panel, live
Timken Museum coil loads: standard sub-cool reheat AHU versus HEDS energy-recovery AHU
ConfigurationCooling load to chillerReheat load (BTU @ meter)Total Cooling + Heating BTU
Standard sub-cool / reheat AHU15.5 tons / 186,000 BTU91,700 BTU277,700 BTU
HEDS energy-recovery AHU10.1 tons / 121,200 BTU0 boiler energy required — uses recovered heat121,200 BTU
Coil-load reduction due to HEDS (Savings)5.4 tons / 64,800 / 34.6%91,700 / 100%156,500 BTU / 56.4%

Real-world savings run higher than any textbook example — every demonstration project has exceeded 50%; several average over 60% annually.

HEDS savings screen shots: Timken Museum at 57°F and 88% RH ambient with 40% cooling-load reduction and 52% of required heating provided by recovery; Naval Base Guam at 74°F and 59.6°F dewpoint with 43% cooling-load reduction and 77.15% total HVAC savings
Small loads · cold/humid and warm/humid — Timken Museum & Naval Base Guam, year-round
OEM-built HEDS project at a high-school gymnasium: live control screen showing 93.4% outdoor RH, temperature deviation 0.8°F, RH deviation 0.4%, 39.3% chiller load reduction and 19.2°F chilled-water differential driving over 75% pump energy savings
Medium loads · OEM-built gymnasium unit, live screenshot — humid Carolina summer
ESTCP performance data from Naval Base Guam with calculation formulas: 32 tons cooling load without HEDS versus 18.3 tons with HEDS, 43% cooling-load reduction, 77.15% HVAC energy savings in mixed-air recirculation during occupied hours
Large loads · Naval Base Guam ESTCP performance data, occupied hours — 77% savings
ESTCP performance data: overnight building dehumidification and pressurization with 60% HVAC energy savings at 100% outside air, base building sub-cool with electric strip reheat
Overnight dehumidification & pressurization · 60% savings at 100% outside air · ESTCP

State point by state point

The process, on the air side and the water side.

01

Filtration & fan wall

4″ MERV 11 pre-filter + MERV 16 secondary (≈95% of virus-sized particles), optional HEPA final stage, UV-C at the coil and drain pans. Direct-drive ECM fan arrays — no belts, no VFDs — improve fan efficiency 8–15%.

02

Cooling coil

Air is sub-cooled to roughly 46–57°F at near-100% RH, condensing out moisture. The oversized, slow-velocity coil lets the chilled water leave warm — 63–75°F instead of the conventional ~55°F.

03

Cooling Recovery Coil

That warm return water flows through a second, sensible-only coil that reheats the cold saturated air to ~55–65°F, as needed by the loads — dropping supply RH to 65–80% with no purchased reheat for most of the dehumidification season.

04

Back to the plant, lighter loads

The now-cooler water returns to the chiller carrying less load. One loop, two coils: the chiller load and the reheat load drop together, and diverse zones take only small trim reheat where needed.

Electric Power Research Institute psychrometric chart showing the HEDS process path and the cooling and heating energy savings between the cooling coil and the cooling recovery coil
Electric Power Research Institute psychrometric chart · the HEDS process path, with cooling and heating savings shown state point by state point

NREL Thermal Test Facility measurement (Shoukas 2025): 80.0°F entering air delivered at 63.7°F supply · chilled water supplied at 43.8°F, returned at 60.9°F after the recovery coil — a 17°F+ differential from one water loop.

Part-load behavior

Where competing systems fall apart, HEDS gets stronger.

Buildings run at part load the overwhelming majority of the year. Sample selection data for a 10,000 CFM tropical HEDS unit at 45°F CHWS — leaving dewpoint holds steady while the recovered fraction grows as load drops.

Dewpoint

Holds steady to deep part load

The cooling-coil leaving dewpoint is continually optimized from peak design down through low part load — the failure point where wheel, desiccant and heat-pipe systems lose control of the space.

Recovery

The recovered fraction grows

As airflow falls, the chilled-water return runs warmer and a larger share of the cooling load can be recovered as reheat — the opposite of conventional coils, which can lose ΔT at off-design conditions.

Fan energy

Pressure drop falls with load

With VAV systems, air-side pressure drop declines as load drops, so fan energy falls with it — compounding the chiller and reheat savings across the hours buildings actually operate.

Conventional coils lose ΔT and stack condensate at part load; low tube velocity slides into laminar flow and heat-transfer effectiveness collapses. HEDS' redesigned circuiting and optimization-driven flow keep the heat transfer effectiveness and the ΔT high across much of the load range. The measured part-load dataset — dewpoint, ΔT, recovered fraction and pressure drop across the operating envelope — ships with the complete selection matrices in the Design Assistance Guide under NDA.

Fort Bragg chilled-water temperature differential dynamic savings analysis: HEDS cooling-coil ΔT holds 14–21°F even at 30–50% load against a 3–7°F base case, cutting chilled-water pump energy by more than 70% and letting undersized pipes carry twice the BTUs
Measured ΔT at 30–50% load · 14–21°F vs. a 3–7°F base case · Fort Bragg field data

The hydronic payoff

HEDS is the cure for Low Delta-T Syndrome.

A 100-ton chiller designed for a 12°F ΔT delivers only 67 tons at 8°F ΔT — a third of the plant capacity is unusable and stranded. Because HEDS coils run a 20–30°F chilled-water ΔT at peak, they attack the syndrome directly — cutting chilled-water flow rates and allowing the chillers to load up fully. Stranded capacity is recovered.

  • Frees stranded plant. Recovers 18–28% of chiller capacity owners already paid for — often enough that an undersized loop starts meeting its loads.
  • Halves the flow. The same cooling load at >2× the ΔT means less than half the GPM — effectively doubling the BTU-carrying capacity of existing piping.
  • Cuts pump energy 50–>70%. Flow has a ~cubic relationship to pump HP. At Naval Base Guam, HEDS cooling coils generated 19°F+ differentials driving >75% pump-energy savings.
  • Defers the next chiller. Load reduction plus recovered capacity lets plants downsize — or skip the replacement entirely.

The optimization layer

Every unit ships with an HVAC-system optimizer, not just a control panel.

The recovery coil saves energy during dehumidification calls. HEDS saves all year because every controller ships factory-programmed and factory-commissioned, continuously resetting seven setpoints: supply-air dry-bulb, dewpoint and static pressure; chilled-water supply temperature and loop ΔP; hot-water supply temperature and loop ΔP.

Thermal Flywheel

Chillers and boilers, off entirely

The HEDS HVAC optimization "Thermal Flywheel" strategy compares conditions to the prior day and floats the building on its thermal mass — at a fine-arts museum, chiller and boiler runtime was nearly eliminated across a five-day-long 47–80°F outdoor swing. No internet connection required.

Runtime reduction

168 hours becomes ~60

In continuous-dehumidification (unoccupied) mode, HEDS positively pressurizes the building with a small volume of very dry air — cutting effective main-equipment runtime by up to 100 hours per week for 40-hour occupancies forced to run 24/7.

Fault tolerance

Built for mission-critical loads

Cascaded failover: HEDS is built for mission-critical loads in locations that may not have adequate maintenance manpower or funding. HEDS software can keep the HVAC system running even when multiple sensors/systems have failed. This example shows the failure recovery pathway when sensors, or multiple sensors fail, but the loads still need to be served. Supply-air sensor → room → return-air → mixed-air → outside-air → reset table → safe default. The unit keeps running rather than losing the space. Proven live when an FDA lab lost 3 of 4 chiller modules overnight — and stayed in spec.

Integration

No DDC rewrites

The factory-programmed HEDS controller reads existing sensors and feeds new ones into the existing DDC system. First-year results at Naval Weapons Station Seal Beach: HVAC electric down 59%, gas down 76% — $927,000 saved.

As can be seen below, the boiler was not running when it was 47°F ambient, and the chiller was not running when it was 80°F ambient. The boiler only ran at about 50% load for 2.25 hours and the chiller only ran for 6.5 hours 15% load during the entire 120-hour period.

HEDS HVAC optimization logic nearly eliminates chiller and boiler runtime for 120 hours: indoor temperature held 69.5–73.5°F while outside air swung 47–80°F, boiler off 98% of hours and chiller off 94%, no internet connection required
The five-day chart · chiller and boiler nearly eliminated across a 47–80°F swing

From the control screen

Live data, not brochure data.

Two snapshots from operating HEDS systems — the same screens we share on a live walkthrough.

100% outside-air federal lab · coastal Puerto Rico

Guam-grade humidity, FDA Laboratory held at 40% RH.

40%relative humidity held on 100% outside air — 48.4°F dew point delivered at 64°F dry bulb
29.1°Fcooling-coil chilled-water ΔT — cutting CHW pump energy by >75%
26.5%cooling-load reduction in the same snapshot
100%of reheat from recovered energy — 15.6°F of carbon-free reheat, from a 2-pipe system
Slide: 100% OSA Puerto Rico Lab at 40% relative humidity — HEDS GUI screen keeping the 100% outside-air lab at 40% RH, supplying 48.4°F dew point air at 64°F dry bulb using 100% recovered energy for reheat; cooling coil CHW TD 29.1°F; 26.5% cooling load reduction; 100% reheat load reduction providing 15.6°F of carbon-free recovered reheat energy
The actual screen · 100% OSA lab, coastal Puerto Rico · 40% RH held on recovered reheat
Thermal Flywheel · fine-arts museum, 120-hour swing

The cheapest runtime is off.

98%boiler off-time — 2.25 hours of runtime at 50% load, as outside air swung 47–80°F
94%chiller off-time — ~6.5 hours at 15% load, across the same 120 hours
69.5–73.5°Findoor range held the entire period — comfort drives everything
0internet connection required — the HEDS HVAC optimization logic runs on the controller

The five-day chart · chiller and boiler nearly eliminated across a 47–80°F swing — see the 120-hour Thermal Flywheel chart in the optimization section above.

See these screens live on a walkthrough →

Electrification

The enabler of cost-effective heat-pump conversion.

HEDS slashes peak cooling loads and can eliminate purchased reheat — letting plants downsize enough to make heat-pump swaps feasible, and funding the transition from the energy savings.

Geothermal, in one sentence

HEDS can cut geothermal heat-pump compressor runtime by 500 to 1,000+ hours per year — further increasing lifecycle cost savings on top of the validated 50–80% HVAC reductions.

Versus the alternatives

Fewer moving parts. More recovered energy. Year-round energy savings.

HEDS trades a larger coil bank for the elimination of every moving, failure-prone component in competing recovery approaches — while recovering up to 100% of required reheat.

Annual HVAC savings
50–80%
New reheat purchased
Near 0% — recovered
Moving recovery parts
None
Exhaust air stream required
No
Total coil air ΔP
<1.0″ WC
Cooling-coil CHW ΔT
20–30°F
Cross-contamination
None
Validated optimization software
National-lab and Navy tested

Competing-system savings ranges reflect Conservant's positioning — worth confirming against your own experience. HEDS figures are independently measured; see Validation & Results.

Straight answers

Where HEDS does — and doesn't — make sense.

A document an engineer can trust states its limits. HEDS is not universal.

Climate

HEDS pays where there are meaningful latent loads — applicable in all but the driest locations on Earth. In dry climates the coil-pairing advantage shrinks to the optimization-software savings (which can still be meaningful). Exception: indoor agriculture and other internally humid loads make HEDS compelling regardless of the weather outside.

Chilled-water temperature

Serving 48°F dewpoint loads generally requires 42–45°F water at the unit — a constraint of physics, not of HEDS. Where the loop can't deliver, the design uses larger coils or a small booster heat-pump chiller. HEDS has held spec delivering 58°F dewpoint air on 54°F water during a chiller plant upset.

Retrofit economics

Tearing out a healthy AHU purely for energy savings can run 8–10-year paybacks. HEDS economics are strongest retrofitting coil banks in existing AHUs, in new construction, at end-of-life replacement, or bundled with chiller-plant or mold-remediation projects.

Space & first cost

HEDS requires smaller mechanical rooms than desiccant and ER-wheel, run-around-coil and heat-pipe systems — and will frequently net the lowest installed cost by eliminating DOAS units and downsizing the plant.

FAQ

Frequently asked questions

+What does a HEDS HVAC system cost compared to a standard air handler based HVAC system?
Approximately the same as a standard AHU of the same airflow. The larger coil bank and slightly larger cabinet size add first cost, but eliminating DOAS/PTOA units, downsizing chillers, pipes and pumps, and skipping strip-heat infrastructure frequently makes HEDS the lowest installed cost option — as SoCalGas found at the UESC project they performed at Naval Weapons Station Seal Beach, where HEDS was lowest first cost, lowest energy cost, lowest maintenance cost and lowest lifecycle cost among all alternatives evaluated.
+Is this just a sub-cool/reheat AHU with a second coil?
Mechanically, yes — and that's the point. The engineering value is in how the two coils are sized, profiled, circuited and controlled: deep, slow coils with far more contact time than standard selections, water-side circuiting that stays turbulent at part load, and an optimization layer resetting seven setpoints every minute, all year long. The result — 20–30°F ΔT and up to 100% reheat recovery — is what 19 patents and the trade-secret selection methodology protect. The methodology itself is released under NDA in the Design Assistance Guide.
+What maintenance does it need?
If your staff can change an air filter, they can maintain a HEDS unit. The only moving parts are fans and control valves — no belts, wheels, desiccants, or refrigerant circuits. The Fort Bragg unit ran 4.5 years on filter changes alone. UV-C lamps are an annual change-out.
+Does it work in extreme humidity? In winter?
HEDS is field-proven from San Diego to Guam, Puerto Rico and Okinawa — including 77% daytime savings in Guam's near-continuous humidity. In heating season, the optimizer floats supply-air setpoints, a preheat coil covers ventilation loads with low-grade (90°F) hot water, and in genuinely cold/dry weather the savings come from the optimization layer rather than the coil pairing.
+Does HEDS improve air quality too?
Yes. Standard MERV 11 + MERV 16 filtration with UV-C achieves >95% single-pass pathogen capture/kill — 99.9%+ in the anti-viral configuration. Low face velocities and short coil sections with extra drain pans also eliminate the condensate carry-off that feeds mold in conventional units.
+Can it be modeled in EnergyPlus?
Existing simulation tools under-calculate HEDS savings — the technology outperforms the models. NREL has completed 59 steady-state lab test points at its Thermal Test Facility in Golden CO, which — combined with several hundred thousand field data points from Timken and Guam — are building a government-backed EnergyPlus module so any engineer can model HEDS with confidence.
+Is HEDS code-compliant?
Yes. HEDS is designed to meet and exceed ASHRAE 90.1 — its energy recovery goes well beyond code minimums — and it brings hospital operating rooms into HCAI (formerly OSHPD) compliance. It is made in the U.S.A., and automation integration is straightforward and cyber-secure: the factory controller works with your existing building systems without DDC rewrites.
+Does HEDS work with 2-pipe and 4-pipe systems?
Both. In 2-pipe systems the HEDS cooling coil can also serve as the heating coil, so no separate downstream heating coil is needed; in 4-pipe systems it depends on the configuration. HEDS also enables larger hot-water temperature differentials in heating season, extending the pump and piping savings to the hot side.
+What can hospitals and operating rooms expect?
Operating rooms are among HEDS' strongest applications: greater than 60% cooling/dehumidification/reheat energy savings have been measured in OR-class duty, with a >57% floor across every demanding application in DoD ESTCP testing — while holding OR-grade humidity and bringing suites into HCAI compliance. Hospitals spend 50–60% of building energy on HVAC, so the absolute dollars are large.
+What savings should 24/7 facilities expect versus standard-occupancy buildings?
Facilities that must run around the clock typically see 45–65% overall HVAC savings from the cooling-load reduction and reheat elimination. Standard-occupancy buildings often do better — 60–70% — because HEDS also cuts equipment runtime by up to 100 hours per week, ending the "run 24/7 to stay comfortable" trap.
+Does HEDS scale down to smaller equipment?
Yes. The design's simplicity — two coils, two valves, no wheels or desiccants — lets it scale cost-effectively down to fan-coil-sized applications, and up through the largest air handlers and 100% outside-air systems.
+What payback should I expect — retrofit versus new construction?
Retrofit ROI can run under 2 years and new construction under 1 — and in evaluated cases like NWS Seal Beach, HEDS was the lowest first-cost option outright, making payback immediate. Economics are strongest in new construction, at end-of-life replacement, or bundled with chiller-plant or remediation work; we'll tell you honestly when a standalone retrofit doesn't pencil.
+What configurations are available?
The same principle applies as a recirculating AHU, a 100% outside-air lab/make-up-air unit, or a DOAS — each with its own design points. Retrofit coil-bank packages for existing AHUs are also proven. Miami-Dade hurricane-rated and marine-grade construction is available for coastal and island duty.

Patents & intellectual property

Protected engineering: 19 issued patents, 9 pending.

The HEDS portfolio covers six layers — the coil configuration, the hydronic piping bridge and valves, the control logic and optimization, multi-AHU scaling, failsafe operating modes, and UV-C/DX integration — with clean title held by HEDS Holdings LLC. A 2024 patent-landscape analysis places HEDS in command of the heat-transfer-coil cluster.

Alongside the issued claims sits trade-secret know-how — the HVAC optimization logic, Thermal Flywheel strategy, fault-tolerant cascade and coil-selection methodology — the parts you can't reverse-engineer from a field unit.

19issued U.S. and foreign patents
9pending applications
6distinct coverage layers
100%clean title · HEDS Holdings LLC

Walk the physics with the inventor.

Scot M. Duncan, P.E. — 30+ years as HVAC SME to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and NAVFAC — will connect you to a live project during the call.